This May 21 took carried out the intermediate stage audience of Jorge Santos, former computer director of the TSE, who was sent to trial for two crimes, the abuse of authorities with electoral purpose and breach of duties for the corruption case seed.
According to Judge Fredy Orellana, the indications presented by the Special Prosecutor’s Office against Impunity (FECI) assume that the commission of crimes was incurred and that the precepts are fulfilled for the syndicated to face debate, instance where your guilt or innocence can be determined.
Prior to dictating his resolution, Judge Orellana drew attention to Santos and his defense lawyer, when referring during his speech at the audience.
“I only want to remember something, that The judge is the one who drives a hearing and therefore must be the moderator of the discussion And that each One of the parties has a rational time to be able to expose“said the judge.
“In this case, unnecessary drifts, or redundant arguments, cannot be allowed because otherwise an audience would be extensive. It would only result in some facts, “Orellana stressed.
The Public Ministry (MP) has Ten testimonial statements rendered at the tax headquarters.
TREP System
“Recall that in this case what is under discussion is whether it was given or not given Good function to the TREP system. It is at a certain time in diverting care indicating that they are only preliminary data, But what you have to remember is that they are or not preliminary datathe obligation of the Supreme Electoral Court It is buying a technically ideal program, because it was bought with public funds“Orellana said.
The judge said that the TREP “was not a given system or a system that someone invented it, but was bought, and therefore Public resources are sacred and must be used in a rational way and equitable. “
He also said that testimonial statements indicate that he allegedly “There was no ideal use of the TREP system And possibly the defendant could have omitted acts that he had to develop and, therefore, he could have breached duties. “
Prosecutor’s criteria
“At the discretion of the Prosecutor’s Office, the accused omitted guarantee and administer the internal and perimeter security of information servicesInfrastructure efficiency and network of the institution, as well as the privacy and integrity of the data of the computer transactions of the Supreme Electoral Court permanently, “said the MP.
The Public Ministry also argues that Jorge Salvador Santos Neill could have incurred the crime of abuse of authority When he held a public office.
The Prosecutor’s Office argues that he considers to have sufficient rational indications to believe that the defendant used the authority he had in the position of the Office of the Office of the Department of Computer Science of the TSE for Electorally benefit the canceled political party winning electoral event 2023that is to say, to the so -called Political Party Movement Semilla.
The Public Ministry said that data was preloaded in the TREP system that would have Benefit at seed during the 2023 elections and that access to people outside the TSE would have been allowed to modify the preliminary results and that they would have occurred in the early hours of the elections.