Lawyers of the parties involved in the case presented their final arguments before the US district judge Amit Mehta, who is considering “Resarcimientos” to impose Google for its monopolistic practices In web searches.
US government lawyers They have asked the judge to order Google to get rid of the chrome browserarguing that artificial intelligence (AI) It is about to intensify the domain of the company.
They also demand that Google is excluded from agreements with partners like Apple and Samsung To distribute your search tools, central theme of this judicial case.
Three weeks of audiences to provide testimonies ended in early May, and this Friday the parties argued on law issues and presented their allegations before the Washington court.
John Schmidtlein, a Google lawyer, told the goal that no evidence had been presented to demonstrate that users They would have opted for a different search engine if exclusivity agreements had not been signed.
The defender said the Verizon firm installed Chrome on smartphones even though the American telecommunications giant He owned the search engine Yahoo! and was not linked by a contract with Google.
Also read: What would happen if Google is forced to sell Chrome?