This was the penalty about Lamine Yamal that the VAR did not review by technical failures

Home Sport This was the penalty about Lamine Yamal that the VAR did not review by technical failures
Sport
August 31, 2025August 31, 2025By Mario Vásquez
This was the penalty about Lamine Yamal that the VAR did not review by technical failures

The 1-1 draw between Barcelona and Rayo Vallecano left a central theme of discussion: the controversial penalty sanctioned in favor of the Catalans after a play in which Lamine Yamal fell within the area. The action, which occurred in the first half, marked the course of the party and generated an intense debate by not having the assistance of the VAR.

The play occurred when Yamal faced two defenders of Rayo in search of entering the area. The youthful Blaugrana touched the ball forward and, in the dispute, ended up falling to the grass after a slight contact with the rival. The central referee did not hesitate to point out the maximum penalty, despite the angry protest of the visitors.

The fact that the most controversy caused was the absence of the VAR in the first minutes of the meeting due to connection problems in the stadium. This prevented the play could be reviewed on video, leaving everything in the hands of the collegiate appreciation.

From the Bank of Rayo Vallecano, the claims were immediate. They considered that the contact about Yamal was not enough to tear it down and that the player had looked for the fault. However, without technology available, the decision was irrevocable.

On the other hand, Hansi Flick and the Barcelona bench accepted the decision and Lamine Yamal did not hesitate to mark and put Barcelona advantage in his visit to Vallecas.

In social networks, the reactions did not wait. Several analysts agreed that the play left space for interpretation, which reinforced the feeling of injustice in lightning fans. The lack of VAR was seen as a setback in a tournament that depends on that tool to clarify determining plays.

Rayo Vallecano, despite the disadvantage, did not lower his arms and in the second half he found the draw with a goal from Fran Pérez. However, the feeling of anger for the prison gained more prominence than the final result.

This episode revives the debate on the dependence of the VAR and the technical problems that can be in question key decisions. For Barcelona it meant a point that knows little, and for Rayo Vallecano, the feeling of having been harmed by an arbitration failure impossible to correct at the time.

Source